Terence Atmane vs Alibek Kachmazov Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Analyzing recent form, Kachmazov's performance on the second serve has seen him win 44.11% of points, whereas Atmane has demonstrated a slightly superior efficiency by winning 48.61% of points. This second serve proficiency shows a strong correlation with match outcome predictions. On the return game front, Kachmazov has recently secured victory in 46.36% of points on his opponent’s second serve; Atmane follows closely with 45.36%. For first serve return points, Kachmazov shows an efficiency of 24.19%, just edging out Atmane’s 23.23%.

The breakpoint saving rate is significant in understanding how players perform under pressure situations. Kachmazov has managed to save 54.5% of breakpoints, while Atmane shows a stronger capacity to withstand pressure by saving 59.91%. Over the past year, each player’s overall match-winning percentages also offer insight: Kachmazov stands with a minor edge at 53.13% (W/L 34/30), whereas Atmane is at 52.94% (W/L 36/32).

The surface-specific stats reveal that Kachmazov performs best on indoor hard courts, boasting a career win rate of 67% (W/L 86/42). Atmane favors hard courts with a 65% win rate (W/L 169/92) but struggles more on grass with just a 33% win rate (W/L 2/4). Both competitors have played mainly in Challengers/ITF level tournaments exceeding $10K in prize money. Kachmazov has secured 51.02% of such matches (W/L 25/24), while Atmane has clinched 55% (W/L 22/18), indicating a slightly higher performance level.

Considering the quality of opponents, Kachmazov has faced competitors with an average rank of 249.19 over the past year. In contrast, Atmane’s opponents have had a higher average rank of 212.03, potentially indicating tougher competition. In matches that advance to a deciding set, Kachmazov has a 50% win rate over the last year, compared to Atmane's 42%, making Kachmazov a more resilient performer in crucial junctures.

Kachmazov's recent breakpoint conversion rate is noted at 27.2%, whereas Atmane shows better efficiency here as well, converting 30.83% of break opportunities. While both players exhibit strengths, Atmane appears to hold a slight advantage across various key metrics. Consequently, based on these statistics, Atmane emerges as the more favorable player for a potential victory in the forthcoming match.